Search Results

Search found 35296 results on 1412 pages for '12 10'.

Page 567/1412 | < Previous Page | 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574  | Next Page >

  • CVE-2011-0419 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability in Solaris C Library

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2011-0419 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 4.3 C Library (libc) Solaris 10 SPARC: 147713-01 X86: 147714-01 Solaris 9 Contact Support This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • CVE-2011-1944 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability in libxml2

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2011-1944 Numeric Errors vulnerability 9.3 libxml2 Solaris 10 SPARC: 125731-07 X86: 125732-07 Solaris 9 Contact Support This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • Google aurait eu une attitude irresponsable avec Buzz qui révèlerait son mépris de la vie privée, se

    Mise à jour du 18/03/10 NB : Les commentaires sur cette mise à jour commencent ici dans le topic Google aurait eu une attitude irresponsable lors du lancement de Buzz Qui révèlerait son mépris de la vie privée, selon une officielle américaine de la FTC Google n'en finit pas de s'attirer les critiques depuis l'affaire Buzz. L'Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) avait ouvert les hostilités en déposant une plainte pour violation de la vie privée devant la Federal Trade Commission.

    Read the article

  • Policies for deciding which mobile devices/OS versions to support? [on hold]

    - by bobfet1
    When developing for mobile devices, what are some strategies to go about determining which mobile devices and OS versions to support? Do some teams set a certain policy in place, like "support devices used by more than 2% of users" or "support OS versions with over 10% of users?" For example, a reoccurring challenge I am running into is the decision whether to support only new OS versions like iOS7 or KitKat, or continue support for older versions. It would be helpful to know how others approach this decision.

    Read the article

  • Multiple vulnerabilities in Ghostscript

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2009-4270 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 9.3 Ghostscript Solaris 10 SPARC: 122259-05 X86: 122260-05 CVE-2010-1628 Memory Corruption vulnerability 9.3 CVE-2010-1869 Buffer Overflow vulnerability 9.3 CVE-2010-2055 Arbitrary Code Execution vulnerability 7.2 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • CVE-2011-0465 Improper Input Validation vulnerability in X.Org

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2011-0465 Improper Input Validation vulnerability 9.3 X.Org Solaris 10 SPARC: 147227-01 X86: 147228-01 Solaris 9 Contact Support Solaris 8 Contact Support This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • Today is my last day at Oracle

    - by user12798506
    ?????????? ???????????11????????Oracle????????????????? Sun+Oracle????2?????2002??Sun?????????10?????????????Java EE????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????? ??????????Sun???2006????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????Oracle??????????Java?IT??????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????? p.s. ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????subscribe????????????????????????????????????????????????

    Read the article

  • Should you promise to deliver a feature that you aren't sure if its implementable?

    - by user476
    In an article from HN, I came across the following advice: Always tell your customer/user "yes", even if you're not sure. 90% of the time, you'll find a way to do it. 10% of the time, you'll go back and apologize. Small price to pay for major personal growth But I've always thought that one should do a feasibility analysis before making any kind of promises to a customer/user, so that they aren't misled at any point. At what circumstances, then, should the above advice applicable?

    Read the article

  • Downloading stream using FileStreamResult

    - by user1400915
    I have a Action in controller as public ActionResult Download() { return File(downloadStream, "application/octet-stream", fileName); } If I want to use FilePathresult as: public FilePathResult Download() { return File(downloadStream, "application/octet-stream", fileName); } can I call the Download() on click of a button like this @Html.ActionLink("FileDownload", "Download", new { file = item.FileName, GuID = item.DocumentGuID }) /text).Width(10);

    Read the article

  • CVE-2009-2409 Cryptographic Issues in OpenSSL

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2009-2409 Cryptographic Issues vulnerability 5.1 OpenSSL Solaris 10 SPARC: 147707-02 X86: 146672-03 Solaris 9 Contact Support This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • CVE-2011-4619 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability in OpenSSL

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2011-4619 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 5.0 OpenSSL Solaris 10 SPARC: 147707-03 X86: 146672-04 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • Windows 8.1 RT de retour sur le Windows Store, Microsoft corrige l'erreur qui empêchait l'installation de l'OS

    Windows 8.1 RT de retour sur le Windows Store Microsoft corrige l'erreur qui empêchait l'installation de l'OS Mise à jour du 23/10/13Les utilisateurs de tablettes sur Windows 8.1 peuvent reprendre avec le téléchargement et l'installation de la mise à jour Windows 8.1 RT sur leur dispositif.La mise à jour avait été retirée du Windows Store suite à un bogue pouvant entrainer l'échec de l'installation de Windows 8.1 sur certains dispositifs et l'affichage de l'écran bleu.Microsoft avait indiqué...

    Read the article

  • Multiple Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerabilities in libxml2

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2011-3905 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer vulnerability 5.0 libxml2 Solaris 11 Contact Support Solaris 10 SPARC: 125731-07 X86: 125732-07 Solaris 9 Contact Support CVE-2011-3919 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer vulnerability 7.5 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • Multiple Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerabilities in libxml2

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2011-2821 Resource Management Errors vulnerability 7.5 libxml2 Solaris 11 Contact Support Solaris 10 SPARC: 125731-07 X86: 125732-07 Solaris 9 Contact Support CVE-2011-2834 Resource Management Errors vulnerability 6.8 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • Virtualbox Update

    - by Raama
    Mac OSX - Snow leopard is host OS and Ubuntu-10.1 and windows xp are guest OS. I recently updated vittualbox to 4.1.10 Ubuntu did not boot immediately, it did an entire system scan and took about 2 hrs to boot. Now it boots regularly but it does not find wireless internet connection, even connecting cable does not help. However internet works great in window xp. I am totally lost, I would appreciate your help

    Read the article

  • CVE-2010-4008 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability in libxml2

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2010-4008 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer vulnerability 4.3 libxml2 Solaris 10 SPARC: 125731-07 X86: 125732-07 Solaris 11 Contact Support This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • Windows 8 : Vupen refuse de donner ses failles 0-days à des « multi-milliardaires » comme Microsoft, le français préfère les vendre

    Vupen content que des chercheurs de failles ne les livrent pas à des éditeurs « multi-milliardaires » Et vend les 0-days de Windows 8 à ses clients sans les communiquer à Microsoft Fin octobre, Vupen avait affirmé par la voix de son PDG - Chaouki BEKRAR - avoir découvert plusieurs failles dans Internet Explorer 10 qui permettaient de corrompre Windows 8. Et ce malgré les avancés du système de sécurité du nouvel OS. La société basée à Montpellier n'a donné depuis aucune information sur son exploit (au sens informatique du terme). Elle a, en revanche, immédiatement

    Read the article

  • Is knowing .NET only enough for a successful career in IT industry? [closed]

    - by rsapru
    Possible Duplicate: Is it better to specialize in a single field I like, or expand into other fields to broaden my horizons? Recently, I don’t know from where I got a thought in my mind that, “is knowing .NET development environment enough for a successful career in IT industry”. Should I be learning more languages too or will .NET suffice me for next 10-15 years. By successful career I mean earning decent living and having good growth opportunities.

    Read the article

  • E-marketing international : guide pour les PME, par Adina Barvinschi

    L'année 2010 a vu un très net passage des grandes entreprises vers la promotion en ligne, phénomène naturel si on prend en compte la croissance du nombre des internautes (plus de 10% par an) et de leur confiance dans le commerce en ligne. Cet article présentera les principales techniques de marketing en ligne accessibles aux PME.

    Read the article

  • Using Unity – Part 5

    - by nmarun
    In the previous article of the series, I talked about constructor and property (setter) injection. I wanted to write about how to work with arrays and generics in Unity in this blog, after seeing how lengthy this one got, I’ve decided to write about generics in the next one. This one will only concentrate on arrays. My Product4 class has the following definition: 1: public interface IProduct 2: { 3: string WriteProductDetails(); 4: } 5:  6: public class Product4 : IProduct 7: { 8: public string Name { get; set; } 9: public ILogger[] Loggers { get; set; } 10:  11: public Product4(string productName, ILogger[] loggers) 12: { 13: Name = productName; 14: Loggers = loggers; 15: } 16:  17: public string WriteProductDetails() 18: { 19: StringBuilder productDetails = new StringBuilder(); 20: productDetails.AppendFormat("{0}<br/>", Name); 21: for (int i = 0; i < Loggers.Count(); i++) 22: { 23: productDetails.AppendFormat("{0}<br/>", Loggers[i].WriteLog()); 24: } 25: 26: return productDetails.ToString(); 27: } 28: } The key parts are line 4 where we declare an array of ILogger and line 5 where-in the constructor passes an instance of an array of ILogger objects. I’ve created another class – FakeLogger: 1: public class FakeLogger : ILogger 2: { 3: public string WriteLog() 4: { 5: return string.Format("Type: {0}", GetType()); 6: } 7: } It’s implementation is the same as what we had for the FileLogger class. Coming to the web.config file, first add the following aliases. The alias for FakeLogger should make sense right away. ILoggerArray defines an array of ILogger objects. I’ll tell why we need an alias for System.String data type. 1: <typeAlias alias="string" type="System.String, mscorlib" /> 2: <typeAlias alias="ILoggerArray" type="ProductModel.ILogger[], ProductModel" /> 3: <typeAlias alias="FakeLogger" type="ProductModel.FakeLogger, ProductModel"/> Next is to create mappings for the FileLogger and FakeLogger classes: 1: <type type="ILogger" mapTo="FileLogger" name="logger1"> 2: <lifetime type="singleton" /> 3: </type> 4: <type type="ILogger" mapTo="FakeLogger" name="logger2"> 5: <lifetime type="singleton" /> 6: </type> Finally, for the real deal: 1: <type type="IProduct" mapTo="Product4" name="ArrayProduct"> 2: <typeConfig extensionType="Microsoft.Practices.Unity.Configuration.TypeInjectionElement,Microsoft.Practices.Unity.Configuration, Version=1.2.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35"> 3: <constructor> 4: <param name="productName" parameterType="string" > 5: <value value="Product name from config file" type="string"/> 6: </param> 7: <param name="loggers" parameterType="ILoggerArray"> 8: <array> 9: <dependency name="logger2" /> 10: <dependency name="logger1" /> 11: </array> 12: </param> 13: </constructor> 14: </typeConfig> 15: </type> Here’s where I’m saying, that if a type of IProduct is requested to be resolved, map it to type Product4. Furthermore, the Product4 has two constructor parameters – a string and an array of type ILogger. You might have observed the first parameter of the constructor is named ‘productName’ and that matches the value in the name attribute of the param element. The parameterType of ‘string’ maps to ‘System.String, mscorlib’ and is defined in the type alias above. The set up is similar for the second constructor parameter. The name matches the name of the parameter (loggers) and is of type ILoggerArray, which maps to an array of ILogger objects. We’ve also decided to add two elements to this array when unity resolves it – an instance of FileLogger and one of FakeLogger. The click event of the button does the following: 1: //unityContainer.RegisterType<IProduct, Product4>(); 2: //IProduct product4 = unityContainer.Resolve<IProduct>(); 3: IProduct product4 = unityContainer.Resolve<IProduct>("ArrayConstructor"); 4: productDetailsLabel.Text = product4.WriteProductDetails(); It’s worth mentioning here about the change in the format of resolving the IProduct to create an instance of Product4. You cannot use the regular way (the commented lines) to get an instance of Product4. The reason is due to the behavior of Unity which Alex Ermakov has brilliantly explained here. The corresponding output of the action is: You have a couple of options when it comes to adding dependency elements in the array node. You can: - leave it empty (no dependency elements declared): This will only create an empty array of loggers. This way you can check for non-null condition, in your mock classes. - add multiple dependency elements with the same name 1: <param name="loggers" parameterType="ILoggerArray"> 2: <array> 3: <dependency name="logger2" /> 4: <dependency name="logger2" /> 5: </array> 6: </param> With this you’ll see two instances of FakeLogger in the output. This article shows how Unity allows you to instantiate objects with arrays. Find the code here.

    Read the article

  • CVE-2011-2728 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability in Perl

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2011-2728 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 4.3 Perl 5.6 Solaris 10 SPARC: 146032-03 X86: 146033-03 Solaris 9 Patches planned but not yet available This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Oracle's product distributions.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574  | Next Page >